Australian court’s livestream platform crashes

Novak Djokovic faced a crunch day as his lawyers fought to win his freedom to play at the Australian Open, but fans worldwide were disappointed as the failure of a live court stream left the world in the dark about what was being disclosed.

Video footage of proceedings was promised by court officials, with huge global interest in the case, but at the scheduled hearing start time of 10:00 a.m., the website platform had crashed.

Djokovic’s case went before Melbourne’s Federal Circuit Court on Monday, with the world number one attempting to defeat a deportation order brought by Australia’s federal government.

Video footage of proceedings was promised by court officials, with huge global interest in the case, but at the scheduled hearing start time of 10:00 a.m., the website platform had crashed.

With the stream unavailable, the hearing was initially said by court officials to have been delayed before word came through shortly after 10:30 a.m. in Melbourne that it had begun.

Serbian superstar Djokovic secured an injunction against immediate deportation on Thursday and spent the weekend at a detention hotel.

Djokovic has won the men’s singles title at Australian Open a record nine times, including last year.

Ahead of this year’s edition, Djokovic arrived in the country with what he insisted were the correct documents.

Yet Australian Border Force officials cancelled his visa application, stating Djokovic had “failed to provide appropriate evidence to meet the entry requirements to Australia.”

Lawyers for the 34-year-old have since stated the Serbian was granted a temporary activity visa on November 18.

Djokovic’s legal team said he was granted a medical exemption for the first grand slam of the year after a COVID-19 positive test on December 16. They added that he was later given the go-ahead by Australia’s Department of Home Affairs to travel.

However, lawyers for the government submitted their court filing on Sunday, disputing Djokovic’s right to come to Australia.

“There is no suggestion that the applicant had ‘acute major medical illness’ in December 2021,” said the government filing. “All he has said is that he tested positive for COVID-19. This is not the same.”

The government document also stated that, should the hearing ruling go in Djokovic’s favour, it must be expressly stated that he could not be re-detained or have his visa cancelled once again.

Otherwise, he could be denied entry to the country once more.

The issue has become a political hot topic in Australia.

Djokovic’s stance on COVID-19 matters had rankled with many, particularly in the state of Victoria, who have faced hard lockdowns during the pandemic.

The case was listed as Novak Djokovic v Minister for Home Affairs. That minister is Karen Andrews.

However, the matter has been one in which prime minister Scott Morrison has also become a central figure. He had insisted when Djokovic’s visa was revoked: “Rules are rules, especially when it comes to our borders. No one is above these rules.”

Djokovic has declined to confirm his vaccination status, but by requiring an exemption to compete at Melbourne Park, it has been widely assumed he has not been jabbed.

The government filing on Sunday stated it was “common ground that the applicant is unvaccinated.”

Judge Anthony Kelly turned down a government request to delay the hearing by two days until Wednesday.

Australian Open tournament director Craig Tiley said ahead of the hearing that he hoped Djokovic would be cleared to play.


Related posts

Ex-Oyo Governor Alao-Akala is dead


Katsina will use people, technology to eliminate bandits: Masari


Hoodlums bathe APC chieftain, three others with acid: Police Spokesperson


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: